1. Cameras to help keep south Los Angeles alleys clean (USA) 2. Vancouver seeks four more TV cameras for crowd and traffic control (Canada) 1. Cameras to help keep south Los Angeles alleys clean http://www.sacbee.com/state_wire/story/3804673p-4830091c.html Thursday, August 1, 2002 LOS ANGELES (AP) - Police fed up with trash-filled alleys have unveiled the first of 11 special motion-sensor cameras they hope will deter illegal dumping and graffiti in southern Los Angeles. A power-pole mounted camera in Watts is designed to snap a picture of - and audibly warn - anyone spotted loitering in a junk-filled alley, police said Wednesday. The steel-encased camera, designed to withstand a bullet, plays a recorded warning that police hope will act as a deterrent: "Stop! This is the LAPD," the recording says. "We have just taken your photograph. We will use this photograph to prosecute you. Leave now." Similar cameras are planned for other South Los Angeles locations, some mounted near abandoned buildings to discourage squatters. Legal experts say the pictures taken would be admissible in court. Those caught 'tagging' or illegally dumping could be jailed for six months and fined $1,000 per crime. Motion-sensor cameras were previously installed in several other Los Angeles neighborhoods. 2. http://www.canada.com/vancouver/vancouversun/story.asp?id=(037F4109-540B-4E5 D-B3E3-DAD625824167) Expanded camera surveillance protested Vancouver seeks four more TV cameras for crowd and traffic control William Boei Vancouver Sun Tuesday, July 30, 2002 RCMP in Kelowna have already installed one surveillance camera and plan to put in five more to watch city streets. The idea is sparking controversy in Vancouver as well. (CP file photo) The city of Vancouver has given up on a plan to run its own helicopter-mounted infrared camera. But now it's upsetting civil libertarians with plan B -- a proposal to buy four more portable camera units for crowd control and traffic management. The city already operates one closed-circuit TV camera, which was first used in 1999 during "the riot at the Hyatt," when protesters gathered around the downtown Hyatt Regency Hotel during a visit by Prime Minister Jean Chretien. It was also used during last summer's Celebration of Lights fireworks display at English Bay, capturing live images of a multiple stabbing incident that were used to send paramedics to the right spot and were credited with saving two victims' lives. The images were later used to flush out witnesses who identified two suspects. Today, on the eve of the first of this year's fireworks show, Vancouver city council is being asked to approve the purchase of four more cameras. They would be paid for with the proceeds of the sale of infrared camera equipment the city has decided to unload. But the B.C. Civil Liberties Association is crying foul, saying closed-circuit TV cameras will inevitably be used for law enforcement, and B.C. is in the midst of a public debate about whether police should use surveillance cameras to keep an eye on people on the streets. The debate centres on Kelowna, where RCMP have already mounted a camera to watch the streets and plan to put up five more, and on Vancouver, where a plan to snoop on about 60 Downtown Eastside blocks with more than 20 cameras is on hold. Both the federal and provincial governments' privacy commissioners have issued warnings about those cameras. "I think we need a full public debate before we see their use for random surveillance, rather than for targeted criminal investigations," Murray Mollard, executive director of the BCCLA, said Monday. "We haven't had that debate yet." What's at stake is privacy, Mollard said. "In public places, there still is a reasonable expectation of privacy. People expect to be able to walk city streets anonymously. They don't expect to be identified." Ron Martin, the city's emergency planning coordinator, said the cameras won't be operated by police but by the city. They are intended for use during large events -- both peaceful and riotous -- that involve large numbers of people and traffic. "We have to be able to know when we can open and close streets to traffic, while the crowds are basically on them," Martin said. They could also be used to gather traffic statistics, plan and monitor routes for visiting VIPs, and monitor slow-moving events such as peat-bog fires. "It basically allows us to free up manpower for use down on the street." The city is acting now because the provincial government and the RCMP will make a helicopter equipped with an infrared camera available to the city, Martin said. That means the city can finally dispose of a $600,000 infrared camera it bought several years ago, which has been kept in storage because it couldn't find a helicopter to mount it on. Such helicopters can be used for everything from locating missing children and crime suspects to monitoring illegal street racing. Martin said $100,000 of the proceeds from the sale of the infrared camera is earmarked for the four new closed-circuit cameras. "The downside," he said, "is that the longer we wait to dispose of it, the less marketable it is as it ages." Martin said the new cameras on city council's agenda are unlike the ones being used in Kelowna or being considered for the Downtown Eastside. "It's not a law enforcement camera," he said. "It's primarily for emergency management purposes. We deliberately follow procedures that make it inherently difficult for us to identify individuals off the film." He said the suspects in the fireworks stabbing were not directly identified using the film. In fact, people who had been with the suspects at the fireworks came forward after seeing the film on television. But Mollard said he is concerned about "function creep." "You collect this personal information for one reason. But gee, now that we've got it, why don't we use it for these other good reasons? That's a reality we see time and time again. "Let's face it, these cameras are going to be used for criminal law enforcement purposes. And if the police tell you anything else, don't believe them, because they were used for other reasons last year." Copyright 2002 Vancouver Sun 1. camera watches kid drown (UK) 2. cameras will detect drowning kids (France) 1. camera watches kid drown http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2170244.stm A CCTV camera recorded the last moments of a seven-year-old boy who drowned after breaking into a school swimming pool. Joshua Lakirham got into difficulties in the open-air pool at St Nicholas School in Merstham, Surrey, on Friday evening at about 1900 BST. He was with a nine-year-old friend, who tried in vain to rescue him before racing away to get help - not realising a qualified lifeguard lived just a few metres away. Joshua got into difficulties in the pool Video footage from unmanned cameras at the site show Joshua, who could not swim, struggling in vain for his life. Only days earlier the local boy had had a lucky escape from drowning at a leisure centre swimming pool. Surrey Police say the two boys, who were not St Nicholas pupils, either scaled the six-foot-high fence or sneaked through a gap in the gates to get to the pool. His distraught family have called for tighter security at schools to prevent further tragedies. Joshua's stepfather David Carpenter, a 64-year-old postman from Merstham, said: "I hope this is a warning to other parents. Keep them away from water if they can't swim. "Kids just rush away and disappear. There's nothing you can do. Cricket-lover "They rush off and disappear and their mothers and fathers never know where they are - and in four minutes they're dead." Mr Carpenter, who is married to Joshua's mother Irene, 38, described his stepson as an "energetic" and "happy-go-lucky" child who loved cricket and riding his bike. He said Joshua could not swim and needed rescuing by a lifeguard at a local leisure centre days earlier. The boy moved to Merstham seven months ago from Guyana with his mother and teenaged brother and sister, and attended Furzefield Primary School. It's a tragedy John Walker Headteacher Mr Carpenter added: "When the school is closed, the pool becomes an attraction for kids to go in there. "Why wasn't it drained? They had fencing around it, but kids can easily climb it." Police said the CCTV footage shows Joshua leaving his clothes in a pile at the poolside before jumping in at the deep end in his trunks. He immediately got into difficulties and his friend is seen trying to rescue him using a pole with a loop, but failing and then running to raise the alarm. Pool 'magnet' A child care officer who lives at the school found Joshua floating in the water and he was pronounced dead on arrival at East Surrey Hospital in Redhill. A post-mortem examination confirmed the cause of death as drowning. Headteacher at St Nicholas School, John Walker, 56, said: "I'm deeply shocked and my condolences go to the family. It's a tragedy." Caretaker Brian Atkins, said that the 25-metre pool became a "magnet" for local children when the school was closed for the summer holidays. Detective Chief Inspector Colin Sutton, of Surrey police, said he planned to talk to local schools about tightening security over the summer because pools were "attractive to kids". He added: "If you were a seven-year-old from a local estate, this is what you would do." 2. Cameras will detect drowning kids http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1234062.stm By BBC News Online technology correspondent Mark Ward A French company has developed an electronic lifeguard that can spot when swimmers are drowning. The system is likely to prove a boon for lifeguards at crowded pools who often have a tough task keeping an eye on every swimmer, and separating those larking about from those in real difficulties. The electronic lifeguard is the work of Poseidon Technologies of Boulogne, near Paris, reports New Scientist magazine. It will go into operation in a UK swimming pool for the first time later this month. Spying on swimmers The Poseidon system uses a network of underwater and overhead cameras to constantly monitor what is happening in a swimming pool. Smart software scans the images picked up by the underwater cameras to work out where swimmers are headed. This is a tricky task because of the constant play of light, shadow and reflections in a pool. A Poseidon camera lurking beneath the waves The software works out what is a swimmer and what is a shadow by comparing images from separate cameras. Shadows will appear in the same place from different angles but swimmers will not. The software tracks the trajectory of every swimmer and pays particular attention to anyone who sinks towards the bottom of pool. If a person stays on the bottom for more than five seconds they are considered at risk of drowning. Poseidon claims that lifeguards have only 30 seconds to rescue a drowning swimmer and only a couple of minutes to resuscitate them if long-lasting damage is to be avoided. Alarm sound It says that for every person that drowns, four times as many people nearly drown and suffer disabilities as a result. The system checks to see if the image is actually a person, using overhead cameras which work out if the bottom of the pool can be seen through the object. If it can then the object is a shadow and is ignored. If not, then the object is likely to be a body and might be drowning. An alarm is sounded and lifeguards are shown where in the pool the body is lying. Currently the anti-drowning system is being used at seven sites in Europe and Poseidon claims it has already saved the life of one swimmer at a pool in Ancenis, near Nantes. The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents says on average 15 people drown in British swimming pools every year. Next week, a swimming pool in High Wycombe will become the first UK pool to adopt the Poseidon system. X-From_: info@notbored.org Mon Aug 19 14:19:13 2002 X-Sender: notbored@popserver.panix.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:10:13 -0500 To: info@notbored.org From: SCP-New YorkSubject: news about surveillance cameras generally (2 stories) 1. Tracking Tarzan through the jungle (South America) 2. New research on effectiveness (England) 1. Tracking Tarzan through the jungle (South America) New York Times July 27 AMAZON SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM SWITCHED ON On July 26, the US-financed $1.4 billion Amazon Surveillance System--a satellite-coordinated network of 19 radar stations, 5 airborne early-warning jets and and 3 remote-sensing aircraft--officially went into operation, scanning 1.9 million square miles of Brazil's Amazon rainforest--an area larger than half the continental United States. The system includes three ground command stations--in Belem, Manaus and Porto Velho--and can track an image of an individual human being anywhere in the Brazilian Amazon. The system was financed largely through a loan from the US Export-Import Bank, and the contract went to Raytheon after intense lobbying of Brazil's government by US. Ostensibly aimed to halt smugglers and illegal loggers, the system has come under criticism from Brazilian nationalists, who fear that it will be used to deliver information on the Amazon's natural resources to the US government and multinational corporations. 2, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2192911.stm CCTV 'not a crime deterrent'Critics say effectiveness of CCTV is "overstated"CCTV is not as useful in the fight against crime as was previously thought, according to government research. The cameras, which have been placed at the heart of crime prevention policy, may be more effective as a detection tool than as a deterrent, researchers found. The report - which looked at evaluations of 22 CCTV schemes in Britain and the US - found that while cameras could have a marked effect on reducing vehicle crime, there was little evidence they prevented violent crime. Spending on CCTV accounts for three-quarters of the money available for crime prevention. Some 170m has been allocated to them for the period 1999-2003. The Home Office-commissioned report said: "Overall, it can be concluded that CCTV reduces crime to a small degree. The growth of CCTV 1990 - Three town centre schemes with 100 cameras 1994 - 16 town centre schemes with 400 cameras 1994 - 1997 Home Office gives 38m to fund 585 CCTV schemes 1997 - 167 schemes with more than 5,200 cameras 1996 - 1998 CCTV accounts for more than three-quarters of total crime prevention spending 1999 - 2003 170m made available for CCTV "An evidence-based approach to crime prevention which uses the highest level of science available offers the strongest formula for building a safer society." A second report on the impact of street lighting considered 13 schemes, and concluded that better illumination could be a cheap way of cutting illegal activity, especially in crime hotspots. Home Office minister John Denham said the study confirmed "that the government has got it right in using a package of crime prevention measures to tackle crime and the fear crime". "Increasingly CCTV plays an important role not just in deterring crime, but in detecting it," he added. "We will continue to evaluate how we can make best use of CCTV and street lighting, whether it's to reduce fear of crime for the public or to provide valuable evidence for the police." At the end of June a report by the National Association for the Criminal Rehabilitation of Offenders (NACRO) said cameras had little effect on crimes against the person, including assault. Camera caution It said CCTV was more useful for preventing property crime, including car theft and burglary. The Nacro report warned against over-investing in the cameras at the expense of "more effective measures" such as street lights. Rachel Armitage, of its crime and social policy unit, said: "It would be foolish to claim that well planned CCTV can never have an impact but the effectiveness of CCTV is often overstated." X-From_: info@notbored.org Thu Aug 29 21:58:32 2002 X-Sender: notbored@popserver.panix.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 21:22:25 -0500 To: info@notbored.org From: SCP-New YorkSubject: clipping service (4 stories) Status: O X-Status: 1. COMMERCIAL SATELLITE IMAGERY COMPLICATES WAR PLANS (USA) 2. Police Photo Database (USA) 3. Traffic cameras (USA) 4. September 11th war game simulation (USA) 1. COMMERCIAL SATELLITE IMAGERY COMPLICATES WAR PLANS August 29, 2002 The increasing availability of commercial high-resolution satellite imagery opens up vast horizons of remarkable and previously inaccessible data to the general public. But it can also provide detailed target information to opposing forces and erode the element of surprise. As such, it represents a qualitatively new challenge to war planners. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld this week lamented the exposure of U.S. forces due to satellite imagery. "I looked the other day at one of our airfields that we use in the Middle East, and there was a commercial satellite photograph on one of the television channels, showing exactly where our fighter aircraft and where our refueling aircraft were located on that airport -- this is on a television station -- from a commercial satellite, showing where our planes were and how they'd move, how one was there yesterday and was not there today, and noting that," Rumsfeld said on August 27. "Now, can we live with that?" he asked rhetorically about this and related operational security challenges. "You bet, we'll live with it." But he added, "I wish we didn't have to live with it." See: http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2002/08/dod082702.html 2. Police Photo Database http://news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,4972863%255E401,00.html Controversy over police database August 26, 2002 POLICE in the US state of Delaware are trying to get a head-start on cracking crimes before they happen by setting up a database that contains a list of people who officers believe are likely to break the law . Defence lawyers and the American Civil Liberties Union oppose the database, which lists names, addresses and photographs of the potential suspects - many of whom have clean slates. The precise grounds for putting a person on the list are not clear. But since the system was introduced in Wilmington in June, most of the 200 people included in the file have been minorities from poor, high-crime neighbourhoods. State and federal prosecutors say the tactic is legal, but defence lawyers object to the practice. "We should enforce the existing laws, but not violate them, to catch the bad guys," Theo Gregory, city councillor and public defender, said. "We've become the bad guys, and that's not right." Mayor James Baker called the criticism "asinine and intellectually bankrupt". "I don't care what anyone but a court of law thinks," he said. "Until a court says otherwise, if I say it's constitutional, it's constitutional." The pictures are being taken by two Wilmington police squads created in June to arrest drug dealers. The units are known in some neighbourhoods as "jump-out squads" because they jump out of cars and make quick arrests. Many of the people whose photos have been taken for the file were stopped briefly for loitering and let go. The Associated Press 3. Traffic cameras: Rear-end crashes go up after they go in. http://www.caranddriver.com/xp/Caranddriver/columns/2002/september/200209_column s_bedard.xml SEPTEMBER 2002 BY PATRICK BEDARD When the nation's No. 1 cheerleader for red-light cameras admits there might be one teensy-weensy downside to the program, you just know it's going to be a lulu so large it couldn't be crammed under the carpet without making a bulge the size of a circus tent. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) recently enthused over traffic- tickets-by-mail schemes for an entire issue of its Status Report. On red-light cameras, however, it did allow that "most studies also reported increases in rear-end crashes." It went on to say, "This isn't surprising. The more people stop on red, the more rear- end collisions there will be." Duh! Not to worry, however, because "photo enforcement leads to significant overall reductions in crashes," assures Susan Ferguson, the institute's senior vice-president for research. Well, that depends on who's telling the story. The institute itself did two studies, both in Oxnard, California, the most recent one published in 2001. Other studies have been done, but the IIHS roundly pooh-poohs them. Why? Because they don't follow a curious methodology the IIHS invented especially for Oxnard. IIHS insists that all red-light-camera studies must account for "regression to the mean" and for "spillover effects." Regression to the mean is a fact of life; in any one year, there could be an extraordinarily large number of crashes at a particular intersection, but over several years the count will revert back to average (mean). Funny that IIHS insists regression be accounted for in studies at stoplights when it never considers the same factor in its studies of speed limits. Spillover effect is IIHS's trick for giving the cameras credit for reducing fatalities even where they aren't. It assumes that red-light cameras at a few intersections will cause drivers to stop promptly all over town, or all over the county, or maybe all over the state, so improvements outside the cameras' ZIP Codes are credited to them nonetheless. As statistical acrobatics go, this one is breathtaking. But you ain't seen nothin' yet. The obvious way to gauge the payoff of red-light cameras is to compare intersections with cameras to those without, then zoom in on crashes actually caused by drivers running red lights. Instead, IIHS considered all crashes at all 125 signalized intersections in Oxnard and concluded that injury crashes dropped by 29 percent due to the cameras, even though they were installed at only 11 intersections. Spillover effect, don't you know. Skeptics will notice that crashes went down rather randomly all over town, and some ordinary intersections outperformed those with the gotcha equipment. The cameras look remarkably ineffectual until, just in time, spillover effect arrives to snatch victory from the jaws of ho-hum. Skeptics will also notice that these IIHS studies, which pretend to be about red-light running, never bother to isolate those crashes specifically caused by running red lights. Why? It says, "The crash data did not contain sufficient detail to identify crashes that were specifically red-light-running events." This is believable only to those who've never heard of police reports. Oxnard, like most California jurisdictions, reports crashes according to the California Highway Patrol protocol, which includes a "primary collision factor," i.e., the cause of the crash. Those reports are collected into a CHP database (SWITRS). Running red lights falls under the category of "stop signals and signs." According to Steve Kohler of the CHP, it includes stop signals and stop signs. Nothing else. Since all signalized intersections in Oxnard are, by definition, controlled by signals and not stop signs, red-light running should be neatly isolated as a "primary collision factor." When IIHS finds numbers that support the story it wants to tell, it jumps on them like a trampoline. When it hides >from numbers as it did in this case, you can bet they go the wrong way. IIHS has refused to release the study's raw data so that others may verify its conclusions, but Jim Kadison, a disarmingly sincere member of the National Motorists Association, went directly to SWITRS for crash data on the nine signalized Oxnard intersections used in the first IIHS study. He smelled something funny in IIHS's breakdown of crashes; just nine percent were rear-enders. Across the nation, it's about 40 percent, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Looking at the data, Kadison could reduce rear-enders down to a single-digit share only by narrowing the definition of intersection to "between crosswalks." Narrowing that way chops off the entire approach to the intersection, exactly where rear impacts happen. It looks like IIHS purposely designed its study to avoid seeing rear- enders. Sure enough, when he opened the "intersection" to include crosswalks and 100 feet each side of them, rear crashes rose to a more normal share. Over this enlarged zone, rear-end crashes increased by 33 after red-light cameras were installed. At the same time, side impacts dropped 25 percent. Kadison concludes that the cameras merely trade one type of crash for another. IIHS's claim of safety from cameras is flatly contradicted by a number of cities that have tried them. "At some intersections [with cameras] we saw no change at all, and at several intersections we actually saw an increase in traffic accidents," admitted San Diego police chief David Bejarano on ABC News's Nightline. In Charlotte, North Carolina, station WBTV had this to say, "Three years, 125,000 tickets, and $6 million in fines later, the number of accidents at intersections in Charlotte has gone down less than one percent. And the number of rear-end accidents, which are much more common, has gone up 15 percent." In Greensboro, the News & Record reports, "There has not been a drop in the number of accidents caused by red-light violations citywide since the first cameras were installed in February 2001. There were 95 such accidents in Greensboro in 2001, the same number as in 2000. And at the 18 intersections with cameras, the number of wrecks caused by red-light running has doubled." The granddaddy of all studies, covering a 10-year period, was done for the Australian Road Research Board in 1995 (cameras went up in Melbourne in 1984). Photo enforcement "did not provide any reduction in accidents, rather there has been increases in rear end and [cross-street] accidents," wrote author David Andreassen in the page-one summary. Red-light cameras turn out to be a very expensive way to crank up rear-end crashes. Motorists in Washington, D.C., alone pay a half-million dollars a month in fines. That's not enough, IIHS says. It wants points on driving records, too. 4. September 11th war game simulation http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20020821/ap_on_go_ot/sept_11_p lane_exercise_2 Agency Was to Crash Plane on 9/11 Wed Aug 21, 6:11 PM ET By JOHN J. LUMPKIN, Associated Press Writer In what the government describes as a bizarre coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft would crash into one of its buildings. But the cause wasn't terrorism it was to be a simulated accident. Officials at the Chantilly, Va.-based National Reconnaissance Office had scheduled an exercise that morning in which a small corporate jet would crash into one of the four towers at the agency's headquarters building after experiencing a mechanical failure. The agency is about four miles from the runways of Washington Dulles International Airport. Agency chiefs came up with the scenario to test employees' ability to respond to a disaster, said spokesman Art Haubold. No actual plane was to be involved to simulate the damage from the crash, some stairwells and exits were to be closed off, forcing employees to find other ways to evacuate the building. "It was just an incredible coincidence that this happened to involve an aircraft crashing into our facility," Haubold said. "As soon as the real world ( news - Y! TV) events began, we canceled the exercise." Terrorism was to play no role in the exercise, which had been planned for several months, he said. Adding to the coincidence, American Airlines Flight 77 the Boeing 767 that was hijacked and crashed into the Pentagon ( news - web sites) took off >>from Dulles at 8:10 a.m. on Sept. 11, 50 minutes before the exercise was to begin. It struck the Pentagon around 9:40 a.m., killing 64 aboard the plane and 125 on the ground. The National Reconnaissance Office operates many of the nation's spy satellites. It draws its personnel from the military and the CIA ( news - web sites). After the Sept. 11 attacks, most of the 3,000 people who work at agency headquarters were sent home, save for some essential personnel, Haubold said. An announcement for an upcoming homeland security conference in Chicago first noted the exercise. In a promotion for speaker John Fulton, a CIA officer assigned as chief of NRO's strategic gaming division, the announcement says, "On the morning of September 11th 2001, Mr. Fulton and his team ... were running a pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would be created if a plane were to strike a building. Little did they know that the scenario would come true in a dramatic way that day." The conference is being run by the National Law Enforcement and Security Institute. 1. Spooks help New York Fire Department (USA) 2. Spy Plane Too Costly for Risky Operations (USA) 1. Spooks help New York Fire Department http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/news/news-attack-newyork-fire.html # # September 3, 2002 # # New York Looks to Experts for Anti - Terror Advice # # NEW YORK (Reuters) - A former CIA director, a former head of # Israel's Mossad spy agency, and a nuclear physicist will lead # the New York Fire Department's development of new technology # and strategies to prepare for terrorist attacks, city officials # said on Tuesday. # # The department, which was devastated by the loss of 343 # firefighters in the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center, # was saddled by poorly functioning radios as the twin towers burned # and collapsed, killing more than 2,800 people. # # ``Our mission will be to evaluate and assess risk,'' James # Woolsey, director of the CIA under President Bill Clinton, said # in a statement. ``Then we will help develop strategies for # ensuring that the FDNY is as equipped as possible to protect # its members and the citizens of New York against whatever may # arise.'' # # Woolsey cited improvement in communications and the use of sensors # to detect biochemical agents at the scene of a fire as just two # technical changes that might benefit firefighters. New radios # are already being tested by the department. # # Other members of the panel include Shabtai Shavit, chairman of # the Institute for Counter-Terrorism in Israel. Shavit headed # Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency from 1989 to 1996. # # Also named were Gregory H. Canavan, nuclear physicist at the # Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Joshua Lederberg, winner # of the Nobel Prize in Physiology. http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,BT_CO_20020903_003729-search,00.html?collection =autowire/30day&vql-string=%28woolsey%29%3Cin%3E%28article%2Dbody%29 NYC Mayor Names Ex-CIA Chief Woolsey To Terror Task Force DOW JONES NEWSWIRES NEW YORK (AP)-Mayor Michael Bloomberg on Tuesday named former CIA Director James Woolsey chief adviser on a panel that will aid the Fire Department in terrorism preparedness. Woolsey , who led the Central Intelligence Agency under former President Bill Clinton and served as an arms control negotiator under former presidents Ronald Reagan and George H. Bush, will head the newly created FDNY Terrorism Preparedness Taskforce. It will examine the department's capabilities in the wake of the World Trade Center attack, which killed 343 firefighters. "Our mission will be to evaluate and assess risk, and to look at the infrastructure and core competencies of the department," said Woolsey , who will work pro bono. "Then, we will help develop strategies for ensuring that the department is as equipped as possible to protect its members and the citizens of New York against whatever may arise." The other members of the panel will be Gregory Canavan, a nuclear physicist at Los Alamos Laboratory; Margaret Hamburg, a former city health commissioner; Joshua Lederberg, a Nobel Prize winning physiologist; Daniel Nigro, the chief of department; and Shabtai Shavit, former director of Mossad, Israel's intelligence agency. Earlier this year, the Police Department named David Cohen, a 35-year veteran of the CIA who was responsible for the agency's worldwide operations, as its deputy commissioner of intelligence. That post was also created after the trade center attack. Updated September 3, 2002 12:52 p.m. EDT 2. Spy Plane Too Costly for Risky Operations http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,61514,00.html Wednesday, August 28, 2002 WASHINGTON A highly promoted, high-flying unmanned reconnaissance aircraft may be getting too expensive to use in risky operations, a congressional committee says. The military says costly new enhancements are necessary to make the craft an effective target-hunter. With new capabilities sought by the military, the cost of the Global Hawk spy plane, which made its combat debut in the Afghanistan conflict, is expected to reach $45 million to $50 million a copy, or as much as an F-16 fighter, Air Force officials say. At issue are the competing visions for one of the Pentagon's latest technological wonders, the unmanned aerial vehicle, known as UAV. With a proposed price tag of $10 million each, the Global Hawk was proposed years ago as a cheap substitute for manned reconnaissance planes like the U-2, whose pilots are at risk whenever they cross enemy territory to snap photographs or eavesdrop on communications. The House Intelligence Committee, in a recent report on its classified intelligence budget, says the military has gotten away from that vision, however, opting to load up UAVs with expensive cameras and other sensors. "You are no longer dealing with a cheap aircraft," said Rep. Michael Castle, R-Del., a member of the committee. "While not disposable (at $10 million), you could at least afford to lose them. Now you're dealing with something you don't want to risk losing." But some in the military say the idea of expendable UAVs is out of date, and money spent to equip a Global Hawk with the best cameras and electronic eavesdropping technology will pay off in better intelligence on America's adversaries. Military officials say they fully expect the planes to go in harm's way and survive. Senior Pentagon chiefs are standing by the plane. They say efforts are under way to reduce the cost. "It's a tremendous platform," Pete Aldridge, an undersecretary of defense who is the Pentagon's chief weapons buyer, said in an interview with reporters. "To start all over again and design yourself a high-flyer like that -- it's going to cost just as much. It's just a matter of fixing it." The plane's military value has increased to the point that the Pentagon wants to add defensive countermeasures to protect it from attack, which would add still more to its cost, officials said. The Global Hawk is designed to fly well above any battlefield, at about 65,000 feet, safely out of range of many anti-aircraft weapons. It can loiter over a target area for more than a day to transmit reconnaissance pictures back to base. It carries no weapons. Its endurance also allows it to photograph an area as large as Illinois in a single mission, said Air Force Lt. Col. Douglas Boone, who oversees the program. Six have been built, and a seventh is to be completed this year. Three have crashed, including two that were used in the conflict in Afghanistan, leading some to question its reliability. Although military officials say such crashes are to be expected in a new aircraft program, the Air Force has grounded the remaining three to seek the causes. Beginning next year, the military wants to build at least 50 more, and the entire Global Hawk program is expected to cost $3.8 billion. Another House criticism of the Global Hawk is it performs essentially the same mission as the U-2 -- taking many photographs from far away -- while the mission of the retired SR-71 Blackbird remains unfulfilled. The SR-71 performed what the military calls "penetrating reconnaissance," flying closer to a target for high-quality pictures. The SR-71 could safely fly over enemy territory because it was so fast no missile or plane could catch it. A new plane, either with a pilot or without, probably would use stealth, rather than speed, to escape. Plans for a proposed UAV, the DarkStar, which would have performed this mission, were scrapped in 1999 after a prototype crashed. Boone expects the Global Hawk to replace the U-2 in a decade or so. Any replacement for the SR-71 requires more money from Congress, he said. The Air Force envisions Global Hawk as the largest of a family of three UAVs. Another is the Predator, a smaller, lower-flying plane that can transmit video. At least 70 have been built and 24 lost, including some in combat. The CIA has armed several Predators, which it has used to strike at suspected al-Qaida targets in Afghanistan. These are more affordable than their big brother at about $4.5 million each. A third plane, called the Predator B, also is in development. Boone describes the Predator B as a hunter-killer that would fly higher than the Predator and lower than the Global Hawk. It would be designed to carry short-range missiles or guided bombs. 1. Bicycle police get TV on the brain (UK) 2. Time to Embrace Big Brother (USA) 3. Two stories (Italy) 1. Bicycle police get TV on the brain http://www.timesonline.co.uk/ September 10, 2002 Bicycle police get TV on the brain By Oliver Wright POLICE in the Midlands, already testing mountain bikes as a way of patrolling their beat, are to take part in trials of miniature video cameras hidden in their cycle helmets. Officers in the Handsworth district of Birmingham will have their helmets fitted with video equipment to record evidence of crime and anti-social behaviour. The footage, which will be recorded on a tape attached to the officer's bike, will be of sufficient quality to be used as evidence in court. If both schemes are successful, they could be implemented across Birmingham and extended to other forces. The video equipment could also be added to regulation police helmets. PC Graeme Faithorn, who has taken part in the tests, said the cameras would not be obvious. He said: "In the same way we have used mobile CCTV vans to film evidence of street crime, the bike camera means we can record crime on the spur of the moment and identify culprits. Video evidence is pretty damning. It's difficult to deny charges if you've been caught on camera." 2. Give Big Brother a Kiss LATimes: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-fi-campus8sep08.story A High School Where the Sensorship Is Pervasive: Cameras track pupils at Santee school. Campus' cameras see pupils' every move. Most shrug it off, but privacy advocates don't. September 8 2002 By P.J. HUFFSTUTTER Times Staff Writer SANTEE, Calif. -- As Mike Brooder pulls into the student parking lot outside West Hills High School, wireless cameras record his face and license plate--doing the same to every car that follows. The cameras then track the 17-year-old senior as he walks up a concrete path, studies his schedule, scratches his chin, waves to friends and then wanders to class. Nearly every move Brooder makes--and every move of his 2,300 classmates--is captured and stored in the campus' database. Following last September's terrorist attacks and years of school shootings, West Hills High sits on the cutting edge of the emerging surveillance society. Each bathroom door is monitored. Sensors that detect the smoke of a single match send alerts to campus security. By Christmas, four more cameras will be installed, and hall monitors will carry wireless computers that can pull up a student's school picture, class schedule and attendance record. School officials are considering whether to expand the SkyWitness surveillance system by adding facial recognition software that will allow a computer to filter out who should--and who should not--be on campus. Technology, once viewed primarily as a learning tool, is building a wall of electronic security on campus. "People are saying they expected this to happen after the shootings and the terrorists last year," said Brooder, an honor student who plays on the school baseball team. "Still, it seems a little overwhelming and extreme." And perhaps likely to become far more common--not just in schools, but everywhere. Schools are among the first to embrace new technology, often because companies view campuses as perfect testing grounds before rolling products out to corporate America. For instance, one of the companies behind West Hills' system, PacketVideo Corp., predicts that demand for products like SkyWitness will grow, as people are tracked at factories, office parks, stadiums--even places such as the Third Street Promenade shopping district in Santa Monica. Companies like the fact that students enjoy fewer constitutional protections than adults and have lower expectations of privacy than their parents. For many students, such surveillance is standard, with cameras at every bank ATM and many fast-food drive-throughs. But the desire to protect has led to an erosion of individual privacy, civil liberties advocates argue. "Once privacy is gone, you can't get it back," said Dale Kelly Bankhead, a spokeswoman for the ACLU of San Diego and Imperial counties. "This is not just about schools, but about a broader social attitude." Relying on such high-tech systems is an unusual move for high schools, but is expected to become a more popular trend in the post-Sept, 11 world, said Kenneth S. Trump, president and chief executive of National School Safety and Security Services, a Cleveland-based consulting firm. At Tewksbury Memorial High School, about an hour outside Boston, the push for security has gone so far as to result in a video-surveillance system that lets both educators--and local police--watch the hallways. "Cameras are everywhere someone wants to watch over," Trump said. The technology at West Hills relies on advanced hardware, but basic, off-the-shelf technology is already used by both parents and educators to watch kids. Software programs can take snapshots of every Web page they visit and every e-mail they send. Devices such as AutoWatch can be popped into an automobile and programmed to record a car's speed, as well as times, dates and the lengths of time it is driven. Cell-phone bills list the calls a student makes and receives. "You might call it control," said Joe Schramm, head of security at West Hills. "We call it keeping the kids safe." Tucked into the scrub-brush valley of Santee, West Hills High appears to be nothing but safe. The average SAT score is nearly 1100, and 70% of last year's seniors are attending either a community college or a four-year institution this fall. But West Hills High has not gone untouched by fear. Less than three miles away, Charles "Andy" Williams went on a shooting rampage last year, killing two students and wounding 13 others at Santana High School. The community was stunned when nearly two weeks later another student launched a shooting spree at a different school in the Grossmont Union High School District. Jason Hoffman, 18, wounded five people at Granite Hills High School in El Cajon. Hoffman committed suicide while awaiting trial. Last month Williams was sentenced to prison for 50 years to life. Despite the violence, the school district was forced to cut its budget across the board; the security group lost three of its 10 employees, including two of the staff members who helped patrol the 76-acre West Hills campus. Hoping to offset the pain of the staff cuts, the district started to look at technology it already had in place on its campuses and explore how the tools could be used for security purposes, said Sue Mangiapane, education global account manager for Cisco Systems Inc. The San Jose computer giant had been hired to install the core routers, switches and servers that formed the computer brain to link campuses with the district's offices and, in turn, to the Internet. Initially, the technology had been designed for instructional use, such as creating digital lockers where students could store their electronic art projects. Then, the focus shifted toward security. At a technology conference this spring, executives from Cisco and San Diego-based PacketVideo began discussing the school shootings and tossing around ideas of how the tragedies could have been avoided. "Schools aren't a key security market for us," said James Carol, chairman and co-founder of PacketVideo, a privately owned software company that creates wireless video networks. The company, along with Cisco and Sony, donated the equipment and handled the installation of the $50,000 SkyWitness system. "This was the right thing to do for a school that's essentially in our backyard," Carol said. The project at West Hills also provided the technology companies with a test lab in which to develop and try out a security system that the firms will ultimately market to corporate America and government agencies. Already, PacketVideo's software is used by cell phone and technology firms such as NTT DoCoMo in Japan and Siemens AG in Germany, and tapped for private security projects. Tech firms such as Microsoft Corp. and Apple Computer Co. have a long history of donating software and hardware to schools. The motivation is partly the push to be a corporate good citizen and partly the desire to influence the consumer habits of future shoppers. "If you want to stress-test a technology, particularly a security system, a school is a good place," said Trump of National School Safety and Security Services. "Most often, the biggest obstacle a company must overcome is the issue of cost. If [the technology] is free, many schools will be open to it." Aiding the decision is the fact that minors have fewer rights than adults, said John Pescatore, research director for security at the industry-consulting firm Gartner. "If the system gets too intrusive, the school and the technology companies are likely to get fewer complaints and fewer legal actions filed over it" than they would elsewhere, Pescatore said. "You can do things on a school campus that you could never do in an office building." Few of the students at West Hills or their parents knew about the new surveillance system when classes began in late August. The school's football team, the Wolf Pack, and the campus cheerleaders had practiced on campus this summer and saw the cameras being installed. Rumors flew, as word of the new technology became campus gossip. Some students, carrying their bar-coded photo identification cards, grumbled about the digital devices that tracked their every step. But most wandered nonchalantly by the wireless cameras, ignoring the monitoring. "We're observed all the time," said senior Kimberly Schmidtke, 17. "It's just that they're now taping us." That such surveillance would not only be accepted but also embraced by some teenagers marks a subtle cultural shift over public monitoring. A few decades ago, students rallied against having their actions recorded by authority figures. But as camera technologies became cheaper and easier to use, they became far more widely used, said Bankhead of the ACLU. Digital cameras sit on top of home computers, peek out of mall ceilings and take snapshots at gas station pumps. Cities such as Simi Valley have approved grants to pay for cameras to catch graffiti vandals, and dozens of towns nationwide use cameras to capture drivers who speed through red lights. "It's been so incremental, we almost didn't notice such monitoring of our lives was happening," Bankhead said. "We don't even know it's there. The more it's there, the more it seems to make sense to people." In the first few days of school, only a few parents voiced complaints--not about the technology itself, but that the district had not informed them that the system would be put into use. "For something so significant, it's the district's responsibility to disclose what they're doing," said Patty Everts, 50, while waiting Monday to pick up her daughter at West Hills. "We knew there was new technology on the campus that was being upgraded. Most people assumed it was for educational purposes, not security." School officials plan to send a letter out to parents next month "as soon as we know the full potential of how we are going to use this technology," said Principal Jim Peabody. "The technology will help us keep kids safe and keep out people who shouldn't be on this campus." But the security system could not have prevented last year's school rampages, because the shooters were not people who didn't belong on campus. Reliance on such technology to attempt the creation of a protective wall horrifies privacy proponents, who insist that the West Hills system is not only invasive, but also gives parents and school officials a false sense of security. "No one's even asking the question: Is this truly going to make my child safer?" Bankhead said. To 66-year-old grandfather Jerry Parli, the answer is moot. Lingering at the entrance of West Hills, he sat patiently in the hot August afternoon, waiting to pick up his two granddaughters. "It's about time they do something like this," he said. "It's a terrible thing, but it's time to embrace Big Brother." 3. Two stories from Italy A) After another home-made low-power bomb exploded in the hands of kid in a supermarket in a small town in the north (where a dozen bombs like that where found in the last ten years), the national association for the rights of the young persons officially asked to change the law that forbids to install surveillance cameras in the supermarkets (the so called 'privacy law'). Btw, it seems they are reclaiming the right of installing them in any part of italy and not only where these facts happened. More at: http://www.repubblica.it/news/ired/ultimora/rep_nazionale_n_272799.html B) The vice-minister of economy in the italian government is being involved in the investigations about a wide cocaine traffic (as a user, apparently). One of the many proofs of his involvement comes from a surveillance camera owned by the carabinieri (a police corps of the italian army) that recorded one of the main cocaine dealers enter the economy dept building and being received by the vice-minister. Nothing has been said on the actual use of these cameras, neither about the presnt investigation nor about its general use. More at: http://www.repubblica.it/online/cronaca/cocafinanze/super/super.html X-From_: info@notbored.org Sun Sep 15 21:05:11 2002 X-Sender: notbored@popserver.panix.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 21:06:51 -0500 To: info@notbored.org From: SCP-New YorkSubject: SCP clipping service 1. Face recognition software (Virginia Beach USA) 2. Face recognition software (Virginia Beach USA) 3. Overview of Surveillance Society (USA) 1. Face recognition software (USA) http://www.pilotonline.com/news/nw0910rec.html September 10, 2002 All eyes are on Oceanfront's new surveillance system By MATTHEW JONES VIRGINIA BEACH -- After eight weeks of installation and testing, the Police Department on Monday switched on its new facial recognition video camera system, which it hopes will aid officers in their never-ending search for criminals. Police, in a news briefing Monday, insisted the surveillance system poses no threat to ordinary, law-abiding citizens, with Deputy Chief Gregory Mullen adding, ``We may not ever make an arrest with the system.'' Facial recognition software works by analyzing faces based on a series of measurements, such as the distance from the tip of the nose to the chin or the space between the eyes. About 80 possible points are compared against 26 different bone structures and then translated into code. It does not register skin tone. This code is compared to the database of people wanted for questioning. If the coded face on the street matches a face in the database, the computer sounds an alarm. A police officer then compares the photo in the camera to the database's 10 most likely matches. If the officer decides that none of the 10 is a match, the person's image is erased. If there is a match, the officer notifies his colleagues at the Oceanfront. These officers then approach the person for questioning. This makes the system no different from an officer with a suspect's photo in his hand, said police Chief A.M. ``Jake'' Jacocks Jr.. The benefit, he said, is that the computer can search thousands of faces simultaneously. ``It's just another tool in our tool kit,'' he said. ``It's not a replacement for officers.'' In late July and early August, police loaded photos of community leaders, resort businessmen, members of the system's civilian audit committee and thers into the system, Mullen said, then had them walk down Atlantic Avenue, where the cameras are located, to see if the system noticed them. During testing, Mullen said, the system had an accuracy rate of 87 percent during the day. The odds worsen at night, when the accuracy rate drops to 75 percent, according to police figures. ``It's not a silver bullet,'' Mullen said. The system currently contains 650 photos of people with outstanding felony warrants in Virginia Beach. Mullen said the department plans to invite other cities in Hampton Roads to submit photos and hopes to have them in the system by next summer. The Beach joins Tampa, Fla., as the only other city in the country with such a system. Tampa's system was installed in June 2001 in its Ybor City tourist area. The system has also been tested at various airports around the country. Tampa has yet to make an arrest using the system, said Mullen, but that's not a concern. The system's deterrent effect interests law enforcement official just as much, Mullen said. If a fugitive knows there's a good chance he'll get caught at the Oceanfront, he said, then he may go elsewhere. Also present at Monday's briefing, were several members of the citizens' audit committee, which was formed soon after the city received state funding for the system in July 2001. This committee helped draft the system's operating procedures. Now, with the surveillance in place, the committee members will conduct monthly audits, said committee member Nony E. Abrajano, of the National Federation of Filipino American Associations. These audits can happen at any time, he said. The only criterion is that someone who can operate the system be on duty. Jay Stanley, an American Civil Liberties Union privacy coordinator, said all public surveillance systems should be put to a rigorous test. The ideal, he said, is to find ``how to use them in ways that increase our security, but also protect our privacy.'' ``With this technology,'' he said, referring to facial recognition, ``the tradeoff just isn't there.'' Reach Matthew Jones at 222-5150 or mjones@pilotonline.com 2. Face recognition software: Mugging for the cops http://www.washtimes.com/business/20020913-96526518.htm September 13, 2002 By William Glanz THE WASHINGTON TIMES In Virginia Beach, Va., police started a digital manhunt for criminals this week by pairing surveillance cameras with new identification technology. It is the second U.S. city to hunt for fugitives by scanning public streets while software compares images of pedestrians captured on camera to digital versions of police photos. Surveillance cameras have long been used on private property, from banks to airports, and their use in public spaces such as the National Mall is becoming more common. Police in Virginia Beach and Tampa, Fla., the other city where this technology is used, see the cameras as a strong deterrent to criminals. But privacy advocates say combining surveillance devices with software to hunt for people walking in public places marks the erosion of freedom because it puts scores of innocent people in a digital lineup. Public officials in Virginia Beach decided to use biometrics - technology to identify people by using algorithms that measure faces, fingerprints and irises - to help them locate criminals wanted there on outstanding felony warrants. That can improve safety in a city that attracts 3 million tourists a year, Virginia Beach Police Chief A.M. "Jake" Jacocks Jr. said. The technology has not led to the arrest of any suspect in the United States. But advocates also see the cameras as a powerful deterrent. "We may not even make an arrest as a result of using this technology," Chief Jacocks said. But "if it keeps criminals out of the resort area and keeps the resort area safe, then that's a success." Police won't say where the cameras are, but the innocuous-looking globes hover above three busy intersections along Atlantic Avenue, the bustling center of the oceanfront community's tourist area. The cameras scan a face in less than a second and up to six images at once, Deputy Police Chief Gregory G. Mullen said. Face-scanning software relies on biometrics to measure 80 facial features, from the distance between a person's eyes to the length of a person's face. Police monitor images from the cameras at the police department's 2nd Precinct headquarters. An alarm sounds if a camera determines that at least 14 measurements match a digital photo. That signals that a potential suspect is on Atlantic Avenue. Officers will determine whether the match is valid by looking at surveillance video themselves. If they confirm the person matches the photo, an officer will be sent to question the person. Police in Virginia Beach, a city of 425,000 people, have digital photos of 650 criminals in their database. But the hardware can store 30,000 digital photos. The department expects to work with other law-enforcement agencies, including the FBI, to search for fugitives and missing persons believed to be in Virginia Beach. Kathleen Stant stood along Atlantic Avenue on Monday in view of one of the city's new high-tech cameras. While she took a picture of her husband, Vernon, Mrs. Stant didn't know police were able to take her picture and instantly compare it to the database of fugitives. No one came for Mrs. Stant, but the technology still made her feel uneasy. "It's kind of 1984-ish," said Mrs. Stant, referring to the novel of that name written by George Orwell about a futuristic society in which the government wields oppressive power over the people. "I understand why people feel the need for it. But the concern is whether police abuse it," said Mrs. Stant, a 50-year-old Richmond resident who traveled to Virginia Beach for the day. Police have tried to ease concerns. Cameras scan scores of innocent people each minute, but police have said they won't store images in their database of people who don't match police photos. In addition, the computer system will only be accessible from the 2nd Precinct headquarters and isn't connected to the Internet, so it can't be hacked. A Citizen's Advisory Committee was appointed to audit the department's use of the technology. Despite those measures, face-scanning software is new and inaccurate and could lead to false positives, when police stop innocent people mistakenly identified as suspects, said Kent Willis, head of the Virginia chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. "We will be very concerned if false positives happen and people get arrested who shouldn't be," he said. The software also is easily fooled, said Michael Thieme, director of special projects at private consulting firm International Biometric Group in New York. "Changes in hairstyle and adding or taking off glasses can really change the accuracy. It shouldn't, but it does," Mr. Thieme said. During a test of Virginia Beach's software, it accurately identified people 87 percent of the time during the day and at dusk, according to data released by the police department. At night it was accurate 75 percent of the time. The Tampa Police Department has used the same biometric software since 2001 that Virginia Beach police are using. Tampa created a stir during the 2001 Super Bowl - dubbed the Snooper Bowl by privacy advocates - when it secretly used the software to scan crowds for suspected criminals. There is concern that police are overreacting because of the September 11 terrorist attacks. "Have we become a crime center all of the sudden? This is very scary technology, and I am concerned about an abusive, intrusive government," said Robert K. Dean, spokesman for the Virginia Beach Libertarian Party and the Virginia Beach Taxpayers Alliance. But the debate in Virginia Beach over face-scanning technology did change after the attacks. Federal law-enforcement officials notified Virginia Beach police that two hijackers - Mohamed Atta and Marwan Al-Shehhi - were in the city in February 2001 and April 2001. 3. Overview: Surveillance Society http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2002/09/09/BUD TL Don't look now, but you may find you're being watched Benny Evangelista, Chronicle Staff Writer Monday, September 9, 2002 These days, if you feel like somebody's watching you, you might be right. One year after the Sept. 11 attacks, security experts and privacy advocates say there has been a surge in the number of video cameras installed around the country. The electronic eyes keep an unwavering gaze on everything from the Golden Gate Bridge to the Washington Monument. And biometric facial recognition technology is being tested with video surveillance systems in a handful of places such as the Fresno airport and the resort area of Virginia Beach, Va. "Our business is booming," said Ron Cadle, an executive with Pelco, the Fresno-area firm that is the biggest supplier of video security equipment. "Since the terrorist attacks, people are not only using video surveillance to protect their property and inventory," Cadle said. For example, "a lot of people are now using video to make sure someone who walks into a department store isn't a known terrorist or felon." Privacy rights advocates say that the increase in video surveillance has not turned the United States into a "Big Brother state" yet, but they fear Sept. 11 has opened the door to creating a "surveillance society." "It definitely could become widespread," said Jay Stanley of the American Civil Liberties Union. "Everybody's using the threat of terrorism to justify a lot of things that don't have a lot to do with terrorism." Video surveillance cameras began appearing in banks and other commercial buildings in the 1960s, but began to proliferate in the last decade as digital technology produced cameras with higher resolution at cheaper prices. Even before Sept. 11, the security industry conservatively estimated that there were more than 2 million surveillance cameras in the United States, and video equipment purchases made up the biggest slice of a $40 billion-a-year industry. Although there are no current estimates, a group of anti-surveillance activists who have mapped the location of cameras in Manhattan since 1998 say they've seen a 40 percent increase in new cameras in New York's financial district since last September. The terrorist attacks have led to a "rapidly expanding use" of closed-circuit video cameras and related technology, according to a March 2002 report by the research bureau of the California State Library. And studies show that a majority of people support the expanded use of video surveillance of public areas and of facial recognition technology to pick out suspected terrorists, said Marcus Nieto, the report's co-author. Nieto has been monitoring video surveillance since 1997, the year public opposition forced the Oakland City Council to withdraw its plans to set up a video surveillance system. "Before 9/11, cameras were something people didn't give much thought about," he said. "Post 9/11, people are more accepting of cameras. There used to be vocal opposition. It's now passive." Potential terrorist targets such as bridges and airports are beefing up video security. Oakland International Airport, for example, has already begun replacing 60 older surveillance cameras with higher-resolution digital color cameras, new color monitors and digital video recorders. Earlier this year, Washington officials activated a state-of-the art command center that can monitor 12 cameras throughout the Capitol Mall area and has the capability to tap a network of other video surveillance cameras throughout the city. The ACLU and EPIC, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, argue that the system can be used to infringe on citizens' rights and are pushing for regulations and public oversight of its use. "It's open-ended surveillance," said EPIC President Marc Rotenberg. "It's the digital electronic equivalent of allowing police to go through your home without a warrant." Stanley, public education coordinator of the ACLU's newly-created Technology and Liberty program, said numerous studies have documented the misuse of surveillance video. The studies found that minorities were more likely to be targets of video surveillance and that one in 10 women were targeted by the predominantly male security monitors for "voyeuristic reasons," he said. Technology now being developed will make video surveillance equipment even more powerful. High-definition television, or HDTV, equipment makes it possible for surveillance cameras to capture an image of a person 3,000 feet away with as much detail as one taken by an older analog camera at 30 feet, said John Burwell, an executive with SGI. The Mountain View firm known for high-tech computer graphics developed an HDTV surveillance system with the Naval Research Laboratory that gives equally high resolution. "If you watch 'America's Most Wanted,' you get clips of (surveillance) video that are fuzzy," said Burwell, SGI's senior director for government and industry. With HDTV, "you can get crystal clear data," he said And a small Reston, Va., firm called ObjectVideo has created "video content analysis" technology that can, for example, automatically alert security officials whenever a surveillance camera detects a truck that has moved into an unauthorized area. "There are increasingly more cameras being installed and fewer people to watch them," said John Clark, an ObjectVideo vice president. "The ratio of security video feeds to eyeballs is going the wrong way." But the most controversial video surveillance technology has been biometric facial recognition, which can identify individuals using the unique distances between specific points on a person's face. Critics maintain the technology is inaccurate and intrusive. So far, facial recognition systems from makers such as Identix Inc. and Imagis Technologies Inc. have only been installed in a handful of systems, mainly for test purposes. For example, passengers moving through the security checkpoint at Fresno Yosemite International Airport are scanned by a system called PelcoMatch, which uses Pelco's cameras and Identix's Visionics facial identification technology. Facial scanning is voluntary for the passengers, who still pass through metal detectors and undergo other security checks. "We're trying to get testing done and get the Transportation Security Administration to buy into it," said Cadle, the PelcoMatch project leader. "Then every airport in the U.S. will have it." And this past weekend, police in Virginia Beach, Va., began formally using a Visionics system that's plugged into a 10-camera surveillance network that has been used since 1993. Police use the cameras to control traffic and crime in a 42-block area filled with hotels, restaurants and bars. Police added three of Pelco's most advanced digital cameras to help scan a database of 2,500 people wanted on various warrants, said Deputy Chief Greg Mullen. In preliminary tests, the system correctly identified nearly nine of 10 people, Mullen said. Mullen said citizen groups like the NAACP and local Hispanic and Filipino organizations are part of the design and oversight of the system. "We know it's not going to be perfect," Mullen said. "But from my perspective, if I'm looking for a criminal or looking for a runaway or missing child, I'd rather have a seven- or eight-out-of-ten chance of finding that person than a zero-out-of-ten chance." ------------- E-mail Benny Evangelista at bevangelista@sfchronicle.com 1. Why the cameras love us (UK) 2. Chance case joins debate on cameras (Arizona) 1. Why the cameras love us (UK) http://www.guardian.co.uk/bigbrother/privacy/statesurveillance/story/0,12382,790 134,00.html Big Brother -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Why the cameras love us Esther Addley charts the growth of community CCTV security and assesses its impact on crime Saturday September 14, 2002 The Guardian In a small darkened room, up a narrow flight of stairs somewhere in Liverpool's main shopping area, a uniformed security guard is sitting on a low swivel chair in front of a wall of video screens. An old-fashioned red phone on a desk buzzes, and he has a low, brief chat into the receiver. It is another security guard in one of the high street stores, alerting him that there is a man leaving the shop he thinks he should keep an eye on. The guard presses a couple of buttons, and slowly swivels a joystick on the desk in front of him. Several streets away and 4m above street level, a security camera mounted on a tall, thin pole rotates inaudibly above the crowd of lunchtime passers-by. The guard zooms in on a bustle of shoppers and presses another button to record the picture in real time. Not much going on here, he says, but the footage will be saved for four months, filed along with the 1,000-plus videocassettes already piled on the shelves and snaking along the carpet in the small control centre. The innocent shopper, meanwhile, continues along the street, almost certainly unaware that he has just been filmed, recorded and logged. CCTV has a special resonance in Liverpool, the city where, in 1993, a camera in the Strand shopping centre in Bootle picked out the grainy image of two young boys leading a toddler away from his mother. Nine years after James Bulger's killers were caught with the assistance of the technology, Liverpool has embraced it wholeheartedly. There are 28 cameras in the city centre at present, dotted across the main shopping and clubbing areas. It is a decent system, and one that has served the city well since its installation in December 1994. But times have moved on, says the council's city centre manager, Paul Rice, and Liverpool needs to be a bit smarter about its surveillance. So, over the next few months, an alliance of the council, Mersey Travel and Merseyside police will install a total of 240 new digital cameras across the city centre and its main arterial routes, and build a state-of-the-art control room from which to monitor them. With 70 miles of fibreoptic cable already laid below ground, the plan is to roll the system out over time to incorporate other business, private and civic security systems. The startling expansion in surveillance capability in Liverpool mirrors an exponential boom across the country since primitive monitoring systems began to be introduced in the early 1990s. In 1994, according to a report in May by the crime prevention charity Nacro, 16 town centres operated CCTV schemes, with a total of around 400 cameras. By the end of this year, the charity estimates there will be 500 schemes in operation, recording, scanning and saving data from some 40,000 CCTV cameras, According to a House of Lords report, when private systems are taken into account, there are more than 1.5m lenses covering public spaces in the UK. Across the country, a CCTV arms race is developing as councillors, traders and police rush to introduce ever-more sophisticated monitoring regimes. New castle already has one of the most extensive systems in the country. In the city centre, there are 25 cameras directly linked to a police control room. But across the city, a mixture of public and private CCTV systems covering shopping centres, industrial areas and housing estates takes the total above 300. Manchester has gone even further. In June, it unveiled its 10.3m digital surveillance system, based on 400 cameras - with plans to expand to 1,000. However persuasive the well-trod arguments of libertarians against blanket surveillance in Britain's city centres, the debate over the usefulness and desirability of CCTV has been comprehensively won by those in favour of increased monitoring. Between 1999 and 2003, Home Office spending on CCTV will amount to 170m. That is matched pound for pound by local authorities - none of which takes account of the massive extra investment by private companies, for which figures are elusive. A single high-definition camera, will full colour imaging and capable of reading a car number plate half a mile away, costs about 25,000. Surveillance has become one of Britain's most startling boom industries - and fittingly, it has happened almost without our noticing. One might be entitled to assume, then, that the technology at least works. In fact the available data on CCTV's crime-busting record is far from unequivocal. Of 24 systems reviewed in the Nacro report, only 13 were found to have coincided with a significant reduction in crime. In seven cases, there was no detectable change, while in four instances crime had actually gone up since the introduction of surveillance monitoring. In several cases the deterrent effect of CCTV was observed to wear off after a period, when crime rates began to creep upward again. Most damningly perhaps, the Home Office's own surveys into the usefulness of the technology have suggested that something so simple as improving street lighting may be four times more effective in reducing crime So why is CCTV embraced so wholeheartedly by local authorities and police forces? Perhaps because, superficially at least, it is undeniably popular. In Liverpool, it enjoys near-universal support. "It's great. I've no problem at all if it helps the police," says Chris Murphy, 66, minding her brother's T-shirt stall on Church St, just below a prominently-mounted camera. "I worry about crime here, we get a lot of robbing on the stall. I don't mind being watched at all." Maureen Rockliffe, 56, popping into a coffee shop after buying some groceries, agrees. "I'm not going to do anything wrong, so why should I be worried?" "My inbox and my intray is just full of questions about when the CCTV is coming, can we have it in our area," says Ian Shannon, a Merseyside police superintendent and the assistant executive director with the council in charge of community safety. "In fact we're having to say to people, hold on, the money is [for this round of investment], when we have more money we'll come to you." "It's about feelings of safety, public reassurance, public confidence," adds Chief Inspector Mike Creer, whose report on Liverpool's CCTV provision underscored the city's investment. "The whole reason for putting this in, at the end of the day, is to make people feel safer, to make people want to invest in the place, to make people want to come into the city, not only in their leisure time but in tourism as well." That, according to Roy Coleman, a lecturer in criminology at Liverpool John Moores university who is researching the role of security systems in the regeneration of cities, may be another important factor in CCTV's appeal. He believes the key driver in the massive boom in surveillance is commercial. "It gives the veneer of a sanitised, clean, healthy public space, and this, says the council, is what investors want. We are turning our cities into glorified consumption zones." Consider the crimes that CCTV in city centres can target, he says: shoplifting, property damage, graffiti, perhaps speeding and other generally antisocial behaviour. These are issues that concern people, but are not the top priority of ordinary people, nor are they crimes which feature in national performance indicators for police forces. Crucially, however, they are extremely important to businesses and potential investors. "The problem with CCTV is this: what is the system really being used for?" he asks. "That is never really clear. What do we mean by a safer city, and who is defining safety? But Ian Shannon insists that many of the problems identified in the previous schemes related to old technology, which will not be relevant to Liverpool's shiny new network. Similarly, he says, focusing on CCTV alone ignores the other policing options which back it up. "The fact is, we haven't assumed that a CCTV system on its own cracks anything. All along we have thought about it only in terms of integrating it with other services. The question is, what is the principal concern for people in Liverpool, and nationally. What do they want dealt with? They want crime and anti- social behaviour dealt with. This will help. Libertarians have nothing to fear from the system at all." Libertarians, in any case, have lost the battle. By March 2003, high above the shoppers, clubbers and passers-by of central Liverpool, the cameras will be silently rolling - and a million square metres of the city centre will be watched, recorded and logged around the clock. Esther Addley is a Guardian features writer. 2. Chance case joins debate on cameras (Arizona) http://www.arizonarepublic.com/news/articles/0819chance19.html Chance case joins debate on cameras By Judi Villa and Brent Whiting The Arizona Republic Aug. 19, 2002 12:00:00 Brandi Lynn Hungerford found out the hard way: We're all being watched. Surveillance cameras, like the one that captured the Valley stripper checking into a Tempe hotel with millionaire businessman Rick Chance the night before he was found murdered, have become a pervasive fact of life, and not just in expected places such as banks, supermarkets and government offices. Cameras also keep watch in schools, hotel lobbies, bars, convenience stores, entertainment venues and street corners. They can deter crime, snap pictures of bad guys in the act and keep traffic flowing, but are they an invasion of privacy? "The question is how much freedom are we willing to give up in exchange for perceived security?" said Alice Bendheim, an Arizona Civil Liberties Union board member. Some defend cameras by saying, "If you didn't do anything wrong, you don't have anything to worry about," but what about the woman who runs to the store in hair curlers and doesn't want her picture taken? "It's as simple as that," Bendheim said. "It's a source of embarrassment for relatively innocent behavior." Still, electronic surveillance, long associated with international intrigue or high-level mob investigations, has found its way into everyday use. It's becoming increasingly common for crimes or suspects to be caught on tape: o Tempe police identified Hungerford after releasing a grainy image of a mystery woman who might have been among the last to see Chance alive. She was arrested Friday in Tacoma, Wash, and accused of murder, robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery. She is scheduled to be arraigned in Washington state today. Police on Sunday released no new details in the investigation. o Last week in Abilene, Texas, a surveillance tape of a Wal-Mart parking lot captured a mother holding the side of a car and being dragged about 30 feet after an abductor snatched her month-old infant. The baby was found safe. o In Phoenix in June, a security camera at Ligouri's Lounge recorded owner Antonio Ligouri's shooting death. Ex-convict James Taylor Sheffield was arrested. "Without those cameras, a suspect can walk in and say, 'You got the wrong guy,' " Phoenix police Sgt. Randy Force said. "However, with a clear surveillance photo of them looking right at the camera, it's very difficult to walk into a courtroom and say, 'I didn't commit that crime.' " Surveillance cameras have popped up from the sprawling beaches of Southern California to the monuments of Washington, D.C. Nearly 2,400 cameras focus on the streets of Manhattan. And at the 2001 Super Bowl in Florida, police videotaped everyone passing through the turnstiles, comparing the images to a database of known terrorists and wanted criminals. Locally, cameras monitor the halls of Valley schools, including those in the Tempe Union School District, where a $3.3 million system was installed this year. The state Department of Transportation uses cameras to keep tabs on freeway traffic and accidents. And Phoenix has cameras set up downtown to monitor crowds, traffic and parking garages, especially during sports and other big events. Chuck Crist, 59, a bank employee, was unfazed by a camera atop a pole at Third and Jefferson streets. "The motive isn't to spy on somebody but for safety," Crist said. "And that's OK with me." Paul Eckstein, a Phoenix attorney, said that when people go to public places, they give up a certain amount of privacy. "It may be annoying to show up on a surveillance camera, but it's a small price to pay for security," he said. The important thing to consider, said Joseph Russomanno, an associate journalism professor at Arizona State University, is the places where people should expect privacy. "Do we have a reasonable expectation of privacy in our own homes? Almost always, yes," Russomanno said. "If you ask that question and you are in a public place, such as a hotel lobby or the beach, then the answer is no." 1. Workers in Nova Scotia (Canada) 2. Anti-camera coalition in Kelowna (Canada) 3. Students fight move to use video cameras in school (USA) 1. Nova Scotia, Canada Workers walk out over surveillance cameras By Broadcast News Monday, September 23, 2002 TRENTON, N.S. -- Employees at the Trentonworks rail car plant in Trenton have walked off the job. About 500 workers launched a wildcat strike Monday, over the company's decision to install video cameras for surveillance. The local head of the United Steelworkers union, Don Murphy, says the cameras were installed without the workers' knowledge. He says the workers only found out about the cameras last Friday. Murphy says the workers won't return until the cameras are gone. A Trentonworks spokesman offered no comment on the strike. 2. Kelowna, Canada hello, i am currently working on a campaign to rid the city of kelowna of its rcmp video surveillance cameras, and was interested in building some kind of larger coalition, that at the very least could coordinate the sharing of information from the various communities directly affected by these programs. if any of you are interested in this or know of those who might be please respond and forward this message, particularly to people from affected towns. dylan.3. Students fight move to use video cameras in school http://www.owensoundsuntimes.com/webapp/sitepages/content.asp?contentID=6386&cat name=Local+news Protests and walkouts promised by students should "spy cameras" be used Bill Henry Wednesday, September 18, 2002 - 08:00 "Spy cameras" are not welcome at Meaford's high school. Walkouts and other protests are likely if the cameras go in as planned, two students told Bluewater trustees Tuesday. On Monday, 255 Georgian Bay Secondary School students signed a petition against surveillance cameras there, Emmett Ferguson and Wes Wright told the boards policy committee. "It goes without saying that this type of practice is not permitted in a democratic society, being more the practice of authoritarian regimes," Ferguson said. The students said the cameras would violate privacy rights and threaten student security. "We will not permit ourselves to be constantly monitored by any person, whether it's for our own good or in the interest of school safety," Ferguson said. The cameras will go in as planned as soon as the equipment arrives. They were supposed to be up already in hallways, the parking lot and near computer areas as part of the board's technology master plan pilot project at the school, finance superintendent Dean Currie said after the meeting. The plan is to make it easier for teachers to use technology, with consistent systems throughout the board. Cameras are going in at the same time as phone and computer systems and wiring as part of the overall pilot program. Currie couldn't say how many cameras will be at GBSS, or exactly where they'll go. The intent is to protect property, not monitor student activities, he said. Cameras, cables, motion detectors and door locks for security will cost about $25,000 over 15 years, or $1,700 a year to protect the investment in computers and other property. "We received no direction from the board to stop the project, or to stop that part of it," Currie said in an interview. Trustees told the students high schools in Hanover and Port Elgin already have some security cameras. Students accept and even like them because they feel safer, said trustee Carolyn Day, who chairs the policy committee. At Port Elgin's Saugeen District Secondary School, the idea came from student and parent councils, custodians and administrators wanting to curb theft and vandalism. "The reaction there has been overwhelmingly positive," Day said. No one looks at the tapes unless an incident is investigated, she added. "I believe these surveillance cameras can help protect your individual rights and freedoms," said trustee Cindy Aitken. "It's not that you're not trusted or that you should feel threatened. It's we're trying to protect you." Trustees agreed the board needs a policy on security cameras, which are also in some school buses and have stopped bullying and other problems. Until then, Day said, it's up to principals, who are responsible for safety and security in their schools. Both Meaford's principal and parent council support the pilot project, she added. The session was taped at the request of Peter Ferguson, Emmett Ferguson's father. Ferguson became angry when he asked for the tape and was told it would be processed and forwarded to him. He demanded it be sent by the end of the day. "I instructed them to prepare it. I want it," he said outside the meeting. The students and Ferguson all said they will continue to fight the cameras, and they distrust board assurances surveillance is only for safety and security, and only in high-incident areas. "We want to just make sure that it's not abused," Emmett Ferguson said. "If they want to monitor their expensive computer equipment I don't have a problem with it. I just want to make sure that my movements about the school and my own personal privacy are of the utmost concern." His father said he was not satisfied with what he heard. "What we are after here is a decision that no, spy cameras will not be placed in GBSS. We didn't hear that. What we heard was we're probably going to put them in, we're thinking about doing a policy and we may put them in before we have a policy. So these children are still under threat, my children are under threat and I don't like it," Ferguson said. He said he has not spoken to other parents about the issue. He asked that students address the board directly because time was short. If there are problems at the school, they should be solved some other way, he said. "We're standing firm on this. No cameras. it's a stupid idea. it's a hurtful idea. It's probably an illegal idea. So let's stop it now and then we can talk." Wright said with schools underfunded, and not enough textbooks to go around, the money for cameras could be better used. He said he expects student will react if cameras are installed. "The talk at the school is people want to walk out for this issue because they feel very strongly about it. And there will be other protests. It's a very big topic at our school and it's talked a lot about." X-From_: info@notbored.org Thu Sep 26 21:48:13 2002 X-Sender: notbored@popserver.panix.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 21:43:35 -0500 To: info@notbored.org From: SCP-New YorkSubject: clipping service Status: O X-Status: 1. World Bank/IMF protests (USA) 2. Workers walk over plant spy-cams (Nova Scotia, Canada) 3. Ohio man files $1.5M suit against Marriott (USA) 4. Police Ask to Ease Restrictions on Political Investigations (NYC, USA) 5. Washington DC Cameras Continued (USA) 6. Downtown businesses worried about loss of cameras (Canada) 1. World Bank/IMF protests (USA) The D.C. police department and U.S. Park Police used their surveillance-camera systems to monitor activities on the Mall. More than 20 officers from 18 law-enforcement and intelligence agencies including Interpol, the National Security Agency, FBI, Immigration and Naturalization Service and State Department watched the 32 monitors at the District's Joint Operations Command Center. The facility, located on the fifth floor of D.C. police headquarters at 300 Indiana Ave. NW, had 13 cameras focused on the Capitol, Washington Monument, Independence and Constitution avenues and several other key areas of the Mall. The cameras at the command center have been used several times this year to observe protests and demonstrations, including those in front of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund in April. http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20020705-86294644.htm All CCTV alarm events are recorded and archived for up to four months. According to McIntosh, an example of an alarm event might be a protest outside the bank's main complex. "Every once in a while, we get a group that gets a permit and comes here and shouts things and wave signs," he said. "We will record an event like that." http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:Jj6TizoyNYQC:www.swhouse.com/pdfs/World_Ba nk.pdf+%22World+Bank%22+CCTV&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 > 2. Workers walk over plant spy-cams 23 September 2002 NEW GLASGOW A wildcat strike at TrentonWorks ended early yesterday after the company agreed to temporarily remove video cameras inside the rail-car plant. Most of the plants 500 unionized employees walked off the job Monday to protest the presence of the surveillance equipment. The cameras are there to spy on the men, said one worker. Give the men back some dignity. Ninety-nine per cent of the men are responsible men. Donnie Murphy, president of Local 1231 of the United Steelworkers of America, said the cameras were installed in the plants main production area without the unions knowledge. Murphy said management told him they had forgotten to inform the union about the cameras, and that they were installed because of vandalism to equipment during the past month. The company agreed to remove the cameras for 10 days while management and the union discuss the issue. Company spokesman Sandy Stephenson declined comment. 3. Ohio man files $1.5M suit against Marriott Hidden camera found in bathroom By Randy Kenner, News-Sentinel staff writer September 25, 2002 An Ohio man filed a $1.5 million lawsuit Tuesday against the Knoxville Marriott hotel after finding a hidden camera in a bathroom light fixture in July. Bryan Brewer discovered the small video camera after noticing a tiny black spot - which he thought was an insect but turned out to be a hole - in the fixture, according to the lawsuit. At the time Brewer, the vice president of a California company, was staying at the Marriott while on business. His attorney, K.O. Herston, filed the lawsuit in Knox County Circuit Court. Named as defendants are Marriott International Inc. and Columbia Sussex Corp., a Fort Mitchell, Ky., corporation that operated at least 28 Marriotts with more than 8,500 rooms. "The allegations have been turned over to the proper authorities, who we are cooperating with fully," said Doug Allen, the general manager of the downtown Marriott. Allen declined to comment any further, citing an ongoing investigation by the Knox County Sheriff's Department. Brewer, contacted Tuesday, declined comment. According to the lawsuit, Brewer, 27, discovered the camera on the morning of July 11. "Thinking it might be an insect, Mr. Brewer swatted at the black spot, thereby inadvertently breaking the plastic cover on the light fixture," Herston wrote in the lawsuit. "He called the front desk, apologized and offered to pay for the fixture." But while he was waiting for someone to fix the damage, Brewer noticed wires and discovered a small video camera. A further look by security personnel confirmed that it was an elaborate, self-contained, video recording system. "The video camera was connected to the bathroom light switch such that the camera would begin recording when the bathroom light was turned on and would stop recording when (it) was turned off," the lawsuit states. Herston said that the equipment had a film of dust on it indicating that it had been there for some time. It also had a piece of tape on it indicating the room number, Room 253. Herston said that Marriott employees let Brewer view the tape in their presence but refused to give it to him. The tape and video equipment have been turned over to the Sheriff's Department. The Sheriff's Department also has refused to give him the tape, Herston said. He also said he's not sure why the Sheriff's Department is investigating the case since the Knoxville Police Department is next door to the Marriott. Herston said the detective handling the case told him, "'All I know is that I was called to the scene and I responded to the call.'" Marriott officials said they have inspected other rooms at the hotel but have refused to say what, if anything, was found, Herston said. "There are a lot of questions and we need some answers," Herston said before adding, "How many other people were taped?" Martha Dooley, a spokeswoman for the Sheriff's Department, said the reason the tape isn't being turned over is because, "It is an ongoing investigation." As for the office handling the case, Dooley said, "We routinely answer calls from businesses and residences in the city as well as the county." Someone from the hotel apparently called the Sheriff's Department directly. KPD spokesman Darrell DeBusk said that KPD did not receive a call from the hotel. The lawsuit contends that Brewer has suffered harm as a result of the discovery. "In Mr. Brewer's case, he has become paranoid," Herston indicated. "He hates to travel now and that has caused tension at work since his job requires so much travel. When he does travel, he spends a lot of time going over every inch of his hotel room to make sure it is safe. "This has really affected his career and well-being." In addition to the $1.5 million in damages, Brewer also seeks the return of all copies of the videotaped recording of him. Brewer has not been back in Knoxville since the incident. "If he comes back, he certainly won't stay at the Marriott," Herston said. 4. Police Ask to Change the Rules and Ease Restrictions on Political Investigations By KEVIN FLYNN and JACOB H. FRIES The New York Police Department yesterday asked a judge in Federal District Court to lift restrictions that curtail police monitoring of political activity, contending that the restrictions now significantly threaten to hamper its counterterrorism efforts. The restrictions, contained in a consent decree signed by the city in 1985, limit the ability of the police to investigate political activities by individuals or groups unless investigators have specific information that a crime will be committed or is being planned. But in papers filed in Manhattan yesterday afternoon, lawyers for the police argued that circumstances had changed significantly since the agreement was reached, particularly since the Sept. 11 terror attacks. The papers stated that the restrictions, which restrain the police from activities such as videotaping political demonstrations, now "limit the ability of the N.Y.P.D. to combat terrorism." Police officials described the consent decree, known as the Handschu agreement, as the product of an era when some citizens might have worried about the potential privacy invasions by government, but when few worried about attacks >from foreign terrorists. Today, police officials said, the same restrictions are unreasonably prohibiting them from using surveillance and undercover officers to monitor terrorist cells that may never engage in overt criminal acts until they suddenly unleash an attack. "We live in a more dangerous, constantly changing world, one with challenges and threats that were never envisioned when the Handschu guidelines were written," Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly said. The city's request drew opposition from some civil libertarians and Arab-Americans who characterized it as a possibly unconstitutional attempt to infringe on civil rights. "To the extent the city seeks to open the door to police surveillance of political activity without any evidence of illegal conduct," said Christopher Dunn, the associate legal director for the New York Civil Liberties Union, "this move is deeply troubling and we would oppose it. While the N.Y.P.D., of course, should be investigating potential criminal and terrorist activity, it has no legitimate reason to spy on lawful political activity." A lawyer for the original plaintiffs in the Handschu case, Jethro M. Eisenstein, said that what police officials were describing as an effort to modify the consent decree actually seemed like an effort to undo it. "The Handschu guidelines in no way handcuff the investigation of terrorism," he said. "They were carefully crafted by a bunch of people who thought a lot about the ability of the country to defend itself." Police officials said they were the only law enforcement agency in the country saddled with restrictions of this sort. In January 2001, a federal appeals court in Illinois eased the terms of a similar consent decree that had limited the ability of the Chicago Police Department to investigate political activity in that city. The three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled that the decree "renders the police helpless to do anything to protect the public" against terrorism. New York City's papers to amend the consent decree were filed with Judge Charles S. Haight Jr., the same judge who presided over the original settlement. They were accompanied by an affidavit from David Cohen, the department's deputy commissioner for intelligence and the Central Intelligence Agency's former deputy director for operations. In his affidavit, Mr. Cohen argued that terrorists used the freedoms of open societies to shield themselves from discovery by investigators, and that the city could no longer afford to abide by guidelines that "place daunting obstacles in our way." Submitted with the affidavit were chapters from the Al Qaeda training manual, which Mr. Cohen described as a guide "for terrorists worldwide." But several Arab-Americans suggested that the city was trying to turn back time to when law enforcement's ability to intrude illegally into the lives of individuals was unchecked. "We've been down this road before," said Hussein Ibish, a spokesman for the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee, based in Washington. "I'm not speculating that granting these powers can lead to abuses. It's a matter of recent history." The Handschu agreement grew from a civil suit filed in 1971 on behalf of groups including the Black Panther Party and the Computer People for Peace who asserted that police intelligence gathering had infringed on their constitutional rights. The suit ultimately led to the consent decree, completed in 1985, which said that the police could only investigate political activity after gaining the approval of a three-person panel, consisting of two police executives and a civilian appointed by the mayor, who were to ensure they were acting in accord with the guidelines. Among the guidelines is a ban on using undercover agents to infiltrate groups unless the activity is approved by the panel, known as the Handschu Authority. Investigators are also blocked from sharing information about political groups with other law enforcement agencies. Under the city's proposal, those restrictions would be dropped. But the authority, which currently meets once every two months, would continue to exist to hear complaints from those who felt police investigators had abused their authority. In cases where the panel finds that the guidelines have been violated, it can forward a recommendation for discipline to the police commissioner. 5. Washington DC Cameras Continued (USA) September 25, 2002 Panel defers vote on cameras By Brian DeBose THE WASHINGTON TIMES The Metropolitan Police Department won't be using surveillance cameras in neighborhoods, but its plan to place them at monuments, federal buildings and major events and protests in the city is about to become law. The D.C. Council's Committee on the Judiciary, headed by Kathy Patterson, Ward 3 Democrat, was supposed to vote yesterday to approve the D.C. police's camera-surveillance regulations -- to be introduced by Mrs. Patterson for a vote by the full council on Oct. 1. But Mrs. Patterson postponed the vote after members of the National Capital Area chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union contacted her with concerns that the vote would violate D.C. procedural laws. "To mark them up now is illegal, because it violates the 30-day, public-comment period," said ACLU lawyer Steven Block. "They are jumping the gun by moving on the regulations so quickly." Mrs. Patterson said no laws would have been broken, but decided to postpone the vote anyway. Mr. Block said the final version of the police regulations were not published in the D.C. Register until Sept. 6. When the ACLU learned Monday of the proposed approval vote, Mr. Block said he "immediately sent a letter to the committee advising them of the time conflict." But the public-comment period was covered in a June 13 joint committee hearing that Mrs. Patterson held with council member Carol Schwartz, at-large Republican and chairman of the Committee on Public Works and the Environment. Several groups testified to their opposition to the cameras and also recommended changes to be made to the regulations. The Washington Times reported in February that D.C. police had plans to link hundreds of cameras to their Joint Operations Command Center as a security measure to monitor activities at city schools, on the subway, at power plants and near water supplies. The command center is the heart of the $7 million Synchronized Operations Command Complex, which is activated during special events or times of crisis. Metropolitan police first used a surveillance camera linked to police headquarters on New Year's Eve in 1999 amid concerns about terrorist attacks. The surveillance expanded to 12 cameras during the International Monetary Fund and World Bank protests in 1999 [sic: it was April 2000] and during President Bush's inauguration in January 2001. D.C. police are using the cameras to monitor the IMF/World Bank protests this week. Mrs. Patterson said her motivation for speeding up the process was to put the police department under regulations. "Right now, there are no regulations in place, and there are less restrictions for the police," Mrs. Patterson said. But she said she was happy to oblige the ACLU because she has worked hard with it and other local civil liberties groups in developing the legislative restrictions. Several groups have opposed the expansion of camera surveillance by D.C. police since it was first reported in February. When a draft copy of the police regulations were released in April, the ACLU said they didn't go far enough. The ACLU opposes the cameras altogether, saying their use would infringe on constitutional rights to privacy and lead to abuse. It also argued that the cameras are ineffective. Camera technology rarely leads to arrests, said Johnny Barnes, executive director of the ACLU's National Capital Region chapter. "What we have seen in England and Australia are reports of video voyeurism by police officers following women around with the cameras," he said. Mrs. Patterson said in her committee report that the final version of the regulations is much improved, with no initiative to put cameras in neighborhoods and the addition of specific law enforcement functions, safeguards against abuse and specific penalties for abuse. The regulations also have more explicit protection of First Amendment freedoms, and the department will be required to do regular audits and reports on the system. 6. Downtown businesses worried about loss of cameras http://www.thesudburystar.com/webapp/sitepages/content.asp?contentid=6929&catna me=News By Denis St. Pierre Wednesday, September 25, 2002 - 11:00 News - Business people in Greater Sudbury's downtown are worried about the prospect that police surveillance cameras in the city core could be shut down. Those concerns were relayed Tuesday evening to Greater Sudbury Police Chief Ian Davidson when he attended a meeting of the board of directors of Sudbury Metro Centre, the downtown business association. "We really need these cameras," said Gary Robichaud, a downtown furniture store owner and member of the Metro Centre board. "I like the fact that, if my alarm goes off, there's a camera on that corner," Robichaud said. The Lions' Eye in the Sky surveillance camera system has been "a very effective tool" in deterring crime and apprehending culprits, said board member John Rutherford, who runs a downtown cafe/bookstore and convenience store. Metro Centre should do whatever it can to help the police service retain and improve the surveillance cameras, Rutherford said. Board member John Fiorino, who operates a downtown clothing store, agreed. "We have to keep it going, because it's been fabulous," Fiorino said. The downtown merchants' concerns stem from a report that the Lions Eye in the Sky cameras could be shut down if the city police service does not comply with new provincial regulations. Ontario's Information and Privacy Commission is reviewing the surveillance system and has indicated it could be in jeopardy if city officials cannot justify its continued use. There also is the possibility the surveillance cameras could be legislated out of existence, Davidson said. Guidelines drafted by the Information and Privacy Commission are intended to limit the use of video surveillance and protect individual privacy rights. However, the Greater Sudbury Police plan to continue to use the surveillance cameras until they are required by law to stop, Davidson told the Metro Centre board Tuesday. "Until we get some sort of clearer direction, it's our intent to keep it up," he said. X-From_: info@notbored.org Fri Sep 27 22:33:22 2002 X-Sender: notbored@popserver.panix.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 22:38:16 -0500 To: info@notbored.org From: SCP-New YorkSubject: clipping service Status: RO X-Status: 1. Strike at the Washington Post (USA) 2. Mayor says cameras will make city money (USA) 3. Up-the-skirt videos not illegal (where else?) 1. 26 Sept 2002. Journalists at the Washington Post are engaged in a byline strike today to protest work conditions. They have decided not to write their names on their articles today and tomorrow. The action came because employees engaged in contract negotiations do not think management has offered the more than 14-hundred employees enough of a pay raise. The journalists are also upset by management proposal to put surveillance cameras throughout the Post building in downtown Washington. 2. http://asp.washtimes.com/printarticle.asp?action=print&ArticleID=20020927-456301 3 # # Mayor says cameras will make city money # Brian DeBose # THE WASHINGTON TIMES # # Published 9/27/2002 # # D.C. Mayor Anthony A. Williams yesterday said he wants to expand # the use of traffic cameras because the city needs the money. # # "The cameras are about safety and revenue, and the way not to # pay that tax is to not be speeding," Mr. Williams said. # # The mayor's comments were a change from earlier this year, when # Mr. Williams told a radio audience in February that the purpose # of the traffic cameras was to "calm" dangerous streets -- not # generate revenue for the city. # # The latest comments also contradict months of disavowals by # Metropolitan Police Chief Charles H. Ramsey, who has steadfastly # contended that the cameras are about safety, not revenue. # # But on yesterday's "Ask the Mayor" program on WTOP Radio, Mr. # Williams said looming fiscal problems forced the city to get # creative in closing a potential $323 million budget deficit. # # "The only reason we're looking at the enforcement with revenue # figures is because we're in such a bind now," Mr. Williams said. # # D.C. Council member Phil Mendelson, at-large Democrat, who has # been skeptical of the city's electronic law-enforcement programs, # said the latest expansion is a clear indication that the city # is starting to see the cameras as revenue sources. # # Mr. Williams also discussed on the program his ongoing budget # negotiations with the council. He said he is still hoping to # gain support for a surcharge tax for the wealthy. # # Council Chairman Linda W. Cropp, at-large Democrat, said there # is no support in the legislative body for income-tax increases. # # Mr. Williams appeared to back off the initiative, saying, "I'm # turning to my own counsel and the people to determine whether # I should continue to put up this fight." # # He said he turned over his final proposal to the council # yesterday. The council will hold hearings on the revised budget # today and vote on the new fiscal package Tuesday. # # The budget plan includes significant cuts in new spending, and # several more cuts for city agencies. # # The mayor and the council also have put in several revenue # generators, such as an increase in the cigarette tax, and fees # for 911 service and fire-code violations, as well as the expanded # traffic-camera program. # # The new budget must be in the hands of Congress by Oct. 2. # # The expanded camera program was part of the mayor's budget # proposal submitted to the D.C. Council this week. The plan calls # for five additional speed cameras, bringing the city's total # to 10, and exercising the speed-camera function in the District's # existing 39 red-light cameras. # # The "Speed on Green" program will utilize red-light cameras to # identify and ticket aggressive speeders, said Kevin Morison, # spokesman for the Metropolitan Police Department. # # "An extra computer chip is installed that tells the camera to # photograph vehicles that are traveling above the posted limit # when the light is green," he said. # # Like the photo-radar cameras, a speed threshold will be set for # the computers. If a car passes the camera traveling above the # threshold, the camera will activate and a citation will be issued. # # D.C. police have not said what the average speed threshold is, # but city officials have told The Washington Times that it is # between 9 and 11 miles per hour above the posted speed limit. # # There will be a 30-day warning period at all new locations before # the ticketing process begins, Mr. Morison said. He said there # will be no "double-ticket" for motorists who speed and run a # red light. # # The city is looking to implement Speed on Green at a small number # of intersections, "probably two to three at first," he said. # He said two accident fatalities this year at the intersection # of Firth Sterling Avenue and Suitland Parkway SE puts that # red-light camera location high on the list for the new system. # # "We think that Speed on Green, along with the expansion of photo # radar, will help us address that problem more effectively," he # said. The computer chips for Speed on Green cost about $10,000 # per unit. The five new photo-radar vehicles will cost the city # about $500,000. # # City officials said it is too early to estimate how many tickets # and how much money will be made from the Speed on Green program. # # The program's technology does not rely on radar, as the mobile # photo-radar vehicles do, Mr. Morison said. The red-light cameras # use a time-distance calculation, based on data collected from # devices embedded in the roadway, to measure speed. # # The city also will have to modify its monthly-fixed-fee contract # with Affiliated Computer Services Inc. -- the Dallas-based company # running the cameras -- for the additional services and increased # ticket-processing costs. As to the revenue-versus-safety issue, # Mr. Morison said, "We have never contended that photo enforcement # does not generate revenue. But I think most people recognize # that the primary benefit of photo enforcement -- and the primary # motivation -- remains getting people to slow down." 3. http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/87863_voyeur20.shtml Friday, September 20, 2002 Filming up women's skirts is ruled legal Law doesn't ban voyeurism in public, Supreme Court says TRACY JOHNSON SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER Jolene Jang was standing at an ice-cream booth at the Bite of Seattle festival two summers ago, unaware that a man had secretly lowered his video camera so he could film up her dress. When she found out, she felt violated and hoped he'd go to prison. She became more leery of others. Now she's appalled that Richard Sorrells, the man found guilty of voyeurism for doing it, is no longer guilty of anything. On Thursday, the state Supreme Court ruled that filming up women's skirts, though "disgusting and reprehensible," isn't actually against the law. "I think that's ridiculous," said Jang, now 28, who lives in the Seattle area. "I feel a little bit vulnerable about it being known that it's OK." The high court unanimously agreed the state's voyeurism law "does not apply to actions taken in purely public places." It overturned the convictions of Sorrells and another man, Sean Glas, who was accused of taking photographs under women's skirts at a Yakima County shopping mall. Sorrells already served his two-month sentence in King County Jail. He was court-ordered to undergo treatment for sexual deviancy and "intends to remain in treatment" even though it's no longer required of him, according to his attorney, Ken Sharaga. Sharaga said the court's decision was correct -- it was what he argued last year, when he unsuccessfully tried to get the case dismissed. "A citizen has to be warned by clear language in a statute that particular conduct is a crime in order to be punished as a criminal," he said. "Something can be wrong and offensive and still not be a crime." The state's voyeurism law protects people who are in a place where they "would have a reasonable expectation of privacy" -- meaning the person could expect to be able to undress in seclusion or "be safe from hostile intrusion or surveillance." But the court found the law doesn't apply to filming people in a public place, even if it's underneath their clothes. "It is the physical location of the person that is ultimately at issue, not the part of the person's body," Judge Bobbe Bridge wrote. The court, which also upheld Washington's voyeurism law as constitutional, noted that other states have had similar frustrations. Two years ago, California changed its law to include a broader range of voyeuristic behavior. In Washington state, Sen. Jeri Costa, D-Marysville, has for two years pushed a bill that would make it illegal to secretly film someone "under or through the clothing." She said yesterday that she hoped the court's decision would be "an impetus to make this a higher priority." Sen. Adam Kline, D-Seattle, said he now plans to introduce a bill "unabashedly plagiarizing" California's law. He expects it to pass easily. "Allowing that behavior to go unpunished is not what anyone in the Legislature has in mind," he said. King County Prosecutor's Office spokesman Dan Donohoe agreed that Sorrells' behavior was "conduct that should be covered" by the voyeurism statute. Sorrells was arrested in July 2000 after Jang told police she caught him reaching into her purse at the Bite of Seattle. Jang said she and others chased him, and her boyfriend tackled him. Sorrells wanted police to know he wasn't a pickpocket. "I did not have my hand in her purse. I was holding my camera so I could videotape up her dress," he told them. "I'm not a thief -- I'm a peeping Tom." Investigators say they later examined the tape from the man's camera and found numerous images of women and girls at the crowded Seattle festival. Many were pictures of underwear shot while the camera was on the ground. In the other case decided yesterday, Glas was arrested for taking pictures up the skirts of two women at a Union Gap mall in April 1999, according to court documents. The women -- one working at Sears, the other at a cart in the mall -- caught him crouching next to them as he snapped photographs using a flash. Police said Glas planned to sell the pictures to an Internet Web site that focuses on fetishes. But the Supreme Court ruled that the mall, too, is a public place where "the voyeurism statute, as written, does not prohibit 'upskirt' photography." -- X-From_: info@notbored.org Tue Oct 15 11:07:04 2002 X-Sender: notbored@popserver.panix.com Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:06:05 -0400 To: meFrom: SCP-New YorkSubject: clipping service is back!! Status: RO X-Status: 1. Video enhancement (USA) 2. Biometrics (Australia) 3. Traffic cameras (USA) 1. Video enhancement The spy's way to watch TV David Lazarus, Chronicle Staff Writer Friday, October 11, 2002 2002 San Francisco Chronicle. URL: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2002/10/11/BU124852.DTL Idon't know where America's war on terror is actually being fought -- Afghanistan? Iraq? Dick Cheney's undisclosed location? -- but wherever it is, a small San Mateo software company is on the front lines. Virage Inc. specializes in technology to index and search video footage. It allows CNN, for example, to instantly sift through hours of raw material for one particular sound bite, and for Wall Street brokers to get right to the heart of executive presentations. More importantly, though, Virage's SmartEncode program allows U.S. spy agencies to monitor TV broadcasts throughout the world and to be alerted anytime a key word -- "Osama," say, or "hijack" -- pops up. With a little customizing, the software also can scan footage from an unmanned reconnaissance aircraft for a convoy of SUVs racing at night through the desert, or a mysterious bag left on an airport tarmac. Paul Lego, Virage's chief executive officer, said he'd like to talk about other clandestine uses for his company's product, but is barred from doing so by security considerations. "I'm not even allowed by contract to say who some of our customers are," he told me. "We spill the beans, and we don't get the work anymore. Or we go to jail." It's not hard, though, to figure out who'd be interested in Virage's bag of tricks. The National Security Agency, which monitors communications worldwide, is an obvious candidate, as are the CIA and FBI. All Lego will admit is that "we have a number of three-letter agencies as customers." In fact, Virage has its roots in the spy business. The company was originally launched in 1994 with a $100,000 grant from the military's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. A second grant of $750,000 followed when the Army's spooks saw what SmartEncode could do. "Virage is hands-down the very best at doing this stuff," said Brian Alger, senior equity analyst at Pacific Growth Equities in San Francisco. "I can't see our intelligence guys working without something like this." In fact, 20 percent of Virage's business is comprised of government contracts, mostly with defense and intelligence agencies. Lego said sales to the government doubled in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. "But I don't want to make Virage a spy shop," he said. "We have many other customers." Indeed, Virage sells its technology to some of the biggest names in broadcasting, manufacturing and finance, including the BBC, General Motors and Credit Suisse First Boston. It was announced last week that the U.S. Senate will be the latest customer to employ Virage's software, digitally distributing each day's proceedings to members. But the company's revenue has been flat in recent quarters, which suggests that the market for video indexing may be more limited than hoped. Virage, which went public two years ago, also has yet to turn a profit. It lost $5.5 million in the quarter ended June 30, compared with a loss of $9 million in the previous three months. The company's stock, which traded as high as $30 per share in July 2000, closed Thursday at just 60 cents. "The quality of Virage's customers speaks to the quality of its product," said Alger at Pacific Growth Equities. "But this is an ugly time for them. They really need to conserve cash and expand their market as best they can." One might suspect that a company like Virage, with hot technology and dwindling cash reserves (not to mention a bargain-basement share price), would be a pretty attractive acquisition target for some electronics firm looking to enhance its video capabilities. Imagine, for instance, how cool it would be if a smart digital recorder like TiVo could also allow programs to be searched for specific content. Viewers could line up all the network news shows, say, and rapidly see what each was reporting about Saddam Hussein or the stock market or the baseball playoffs. Lego said several potential suitors have approached Virage and "kicked the tires." He also acknowledged that partnership talks have been held with Japan's Sony Corp., but declined to comment on what, if anything, came of those discussions. At the moment, Lego stressed, Virage is content to go it alone and he remains upbeat about the company's prospects. Last month, he took advantage of Virage's low share price to increase his stake in the company from 9.7 percent to 11.8 percent. Yet even though Lego is keen for Virage to be seen as a mainstream software developer, he's aware that in today's security-conscious world, with potential enemies lurking everywhere, spy agencies remain his most avid customers. Not coincidentally, Virage recently put together a new demo of its technology in action. It features footage from the Arabic news channel Al- Jazeera being digitally indexed and translated. The demo, Lego said, has resulted in Virage receiving new funds for research and development. So who did he show it to? "I can't tell you," Lego replied. "That's classified." 2. http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,5286113%5E15321%5E%5Enbv%5 E15306,00.html Biometric checks must improve Karen Dearne OCTOBER 15, 2002 THE accuracy of biometric systems needs to improve if widespread acceptance is to be achieved, the Biometrics Institute Conference has been warned. ANZ Bank fraud risk head Lawrence Cox said a 1.6 per cent false acceptance rate "on 80 million cheques issued across Australia in 2001 would mean more than one million cheques being issued and accepted falsely". "In 2001, we identified that 12,500 cheques had been falsely issued, so there's a big difference there," he said. "How much is that in dollar terms? "Likewise, the false rejection rate is a concern. I don't want to be called to my managing director's office and asked why someone is locked up in an overseas country because their cheque or smartcard has been refused." There was potential to use biometrics to improve customer service and the security of systems, but the error rate would need to be cut before there was widespread acceptance, Mr Cox said. The conference, held in Sydney last Friday, canvassed the latest developments in iris, facial, fingerprint, handwriting and voice recognition systems. Many of these technologies are being deployed in security environments such as airports for passenger control and customs, as well as the financial sector and government agencies. Sebastien Eid, area manager of fingerprint technology leader Sagem, said biometric systems were being used at airports for various purposes. "Iris recognition is very good at one-to-one recognition, for example, and will become very convenient as cameras get smaller and better," Mr Eid said. "Facial recognition is being used by the Department of Defense in the US for crowd surveillance and interceptions, and fingerprints are used for background checking of individuals." Argus Solutions chief executive Bruce Lyman said there was great scope for various biometrics to sit side by side. He warned against going overboard, as there were many situations in which biometric authentication would be overkill. "Identification in its own right has no merit," he said. "Identification for doing something has every merit." Mr Lyman said resistance to biometric roll-outs had largely evaporated. "Five years ago, we had to explain what biometrics was," he said. "Now our biggest difficulty is not in initial acceptance of the concept, but in educating folk who are confronting this technology for the first time." VeCommerce government services manager Clive Summerfield said people would use biometrics if a real benefit was delivered. "In speech-recognition, I was always told that no-one would ever speak to a computer," he said. "Yet at the Commonwealth Bank, more than 40 per cent of the calls to Commonwealth Securities are answered by a computer and people talk to it. "It all comes down to the value proposition." 3. Traffic cameras http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/15/national/15CAME.html # # October 15, 2002 # Traffic Cameras Could Help Solve Crimes # By JOHN TIERNEY # # WASHINGTON, Oct. 14 -- It may seem impossible to pick out a serial # killer roaming the highways of a sprawling metropolitan region, # but the task is far from hopeless. # # The van or car of the suburban sniper who is operating here has # surely been captured at least briefly by a government camera # already in place, and the authorities might have quickly developed # a short list of suspects if they were using the more advanced # cameras that monitor traffic in other cities. # # Hundreds of cameras continuously record traffic on highways and # streets in suburban Washington, including intersections near # where the sniper fired. The police have not disclosed what # information, if any, they have obtained. They have been spotted # checking those cameras, including one that tickets red-light # violators near the school in Bowie, Md., where a student was # shot. # # A sniper obeying traffic signals could have avoided the scores # of red-light cameras in the region, because they typically # photograph just violators. But the sniper must have shown up # on the hundreds of video cameras that feed live images to traffic # managers and public Web sites. Those cameras are along major # suburban highways and at most major intersections in Montgomery # County, Md., where the shootings began. # # The images from those cameras are ordinarily not stored, though. # Even if they were, the pictures are generally too widely focused # and grainy for the police to read license plates. Other cameras, # already used on toll roads here and on many roads in England, # can instantly read and record license plate numbers. # # "Our equipment could record every license plate on Interstate # 95, whether the cars were in bumper-to-bumper traffic or moving # 150 miles an hour," said Donal Waide, a project engineer for # Computer Recognition Systems, a British company that 20 years # ago using cameras and computers to spot stolen cars. # # For an idea of what could be done today, Mr. Waide pointed to # the Coolidge Bridge over the Connecticut River between Northampton # and Hadley, Mass. Images are at http://crs-its.com/Coolidge # /coolidge.shtml, a Web page that shows regularly updated pictures # of traffic on Route 9. Besides taking snapshots of each car, # the computerized system reads its license plate so the car can # be identified again down the road, enabling the computer to tell # the public exactly how fast traffic is moving. # # A system like that on roads used by the sniper could allow a # computer to sort through the license plates quickly and help # the police narrow the search, said Dr. Lawrence W. Sherman, # director of the Jerry Lee Center of Criminology at the University # of Pennsylvania. # # "If you placed a vehicle near several of the murder scenes, that # information could help police find the sniper and the rifle," # Dr. Sherman said. "In fact, it's even possible that the sniper # has generally stayed out of the District of Columbia because # he knows it has been more active than the suburban jurisdictions # in setting up red-light cameras." # # Although surveillance cameras might be useful in this case, Dr. # Sherman said, it is unclear exactly how reliable they are at # reading license plates or how effective they are at reducing # the crime rate. # # "There's been a remarkable spread of these cameras in the past # two decades without much evaluation," he said. "Surveillance # cameras have certainly helped solve some crimes. Murderers and # robbers have been caught thanks to cameras at A.T.M.'s. But we # haven't done the sort of randomized controlled trials to tell # what effect they have on deterring crime or detecting offenders." # # Keeping track of cars and trucks on the road could be a valuable # tool against terrorism, especially in Washington, said # Representative Ellen O. Tauscher, a California Democrat who has # studied highway surveillance as a member of the Transportation # and Infrastructure Committee. # # "With the sniper, we see the unpredictable randomness that we # see with terrorists," Ms. Tauscher said. "We need new tools to # give us a very different way of looking at things. People have # peace of mind knowing that there's technology out there protecting # them and letting the bad guys know that they're being watched. # We all have natural concerns about Big Brother, and you don't # necessarily want to know who's driving. But it does help to know # which car was where. I don't think most people object to the # recording of the information, as long as it's not abused." # # The police in the United States have used computer information # from toll roads to track criminals. F.B.I. agents investigating # the kidnapping and murder of Nelson G. Gross, a New Jersey # millionaire, in 1997 tracked the kidnappers' across the George # Washington Bridge, thanks to the E-ZPass transponder in Mr. # Gross's car. # # Such surveillance worries critics like Representative Dick Armey, # the Texas Republican who is the majority leader. He wrote a letter # last year to Interior Secretary Gale A. Norton objecting to a # National Park Service plan to install surveillance cameras to # catch speeders on the George Washington Parkway in suburban # Washington. # # "I'm committed to doing what it takes to make our roads safer, # but not at the cost of our fundamental rights," Mr. Armey wrote. # "Likewise, I am concerned that this may be seen as a step toward # a Big Brother surveillance state, where the government monitors # the comings and goings of its citizens."

Contact the NY Surveillance Camera Players

By e-mail SCP@notbored.org

By snail mail: SCP c/o NOT BORED! POB 1115, Stuyvesant Station, New York City 10009-9998



NY Surveillance Camera Players


NOT BORED!